Feb. 2017 Digital Edition

Click Here

January 2017 Digital Edition

Click Here

Nov/Dec 2016 Digital Edition

Click Here

Oct 2016 Digital Edition

Click Here

Sept 2016 Digital Edition

Click Here

Aug 2016 Digital Edition

Click Here

July 2016 Digital Edition

 

Click Here

Technology Sectors

Market Sectors

Coalition of immigration, civil rights groups urge Supreme Court to review Texas v. United States lawsuit

Washington, DC, December 1 - Today, a coalition of 224 immigration, civil rights, labor, and social service groups filed an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief, urging the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Texas v. United States, which has delayed implementation of President Obama’s 2014 deferred action initiatives

The filing from the American Immigration Council, National Immigration Law Center, Service Employees International Union, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, Advancement Project, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, among others, supports the Government’s petition for certiorari, which is the first step in seeking Supreme Court review. The coalition acted swiftly given that the Department of Justice has requested a briefing schedule that would allow the Supreme Court ample time to hear the case during the current term and issue a decision by June 2016.

On November 9, 2015, a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the federal government’s appeal of the preliminary injunction that has halted implementation of President Obama’s 2014 deferred action initiatives. Then, on November 20, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice formally asked the Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s decision in the Texas lawsuit. The Supreme Court could decide early in 2016 whether it will hear the case this term. If the Court takes the case, it would likely rule in June 2016.

The groups’ brief provides personal stories and testimonials about potential beneficiaries of the President’s deferred action initiatives that would positively impact millions of U.S. citizen and lawful permanent resident children, family members, employers, employees and other community members. The groups explain that the sweeping injunction upheld in the lower court directly harms individuals who have either been in the U.S. since they were children or are the parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

The legal challenges began almost immediately after the President’s announcement in November 2015 that DHS would expand eligibility for the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and expand protections for parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents through a program known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA). Together, the programs would allow millions of undocumented individuals to remain in the United States without fear of deportation and apply for work permits for a period of three years, with the possibility of renewal.

The legal challenges will likely continue all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. On Tuesday, the court rejected Texas’s request for a 30-day filing extension, which keeps the case on track for possible consideration before the court in 2016.

Photo by Eric E. Johnson.

- See more at: http://immigrationimpact.com/2015/12/01/supreme-court-executive-action-a...

 

Recent Videos

“Varian’s Imaging Components business has a 50 plus year history of dedication to the imaging industry.”—Sunny Sanyal, Senior Vice President and...
IntraLogic's official release of the "One Button" Lockdown system on CBS 2 News.
HID Global is opening the door to a new era of security and convenience.  Powered by Seos technology, the HID Mobile Access solution delivers a...
Mobile device forensics can make a difference in many investigations, but you need training that teaches you how to get the most out of your mobile...